Is Wikihow Reliable?

Is Wikihow Reliable?

Evaluating the reliability of WikiHow requires examining various factors, including its editorial processes, authorship, citations, accuracy, and community contributions. In this essay, we will explore these aspects to determine WikiHow’s reliability as a source of information.

Editorial Processes:

WikiHow employs a team of editors and administrators who oversee the content creation and moderation processes. These individuals review new articles, monitor edits, and enforce editorial guidelines to ensure accuracy and quality. Additionally, WikiHow has developed a set of policies and guidelines that contributors are expected to follow when creating or editing articles. These guidelines cover areas such as sourcing, neutrality, and verifiability, providing a framework for maintaining reliability.


One aspect that distinguishes WikiHow from traditional sources of information is its collaborative authorship model. Articles on WikiHow are typically written and edited by a diverse community of contributors from around the world. While this collaborative approach allows for a wide range of perspectives and expertise, it also introduces variability in the quality and accuracy of articles. However, WikiHow’s editorial processes aim to mitigate these risks by providing oversight and review mechanisms.

Citations and Sources:

One of the key criteria for evaluating the reliability of information is the presence of citations and sources. WikiHow encourages contributors to provide citations for factual claims and information presented in articles. However, the level of adherence to this guideline varies across articles, with some containing extensive citations and others lacking proper sourcing. Additionally, WikiHow’s policies allow for the inclusion of personal experiences and advice, which may not always be supported by external sources.


The accuracy of information presented on WikiHow depends largely on the expertise and diligence of contributors. While many articles undergo thorough review and editing, others may contain inaccuracies or outdated information. WikiHow’s community-driven nature means that errors or inaccuracies can be introduced during the editing process. However, the platform has mechanisms in place to address these issues, including the ability for users to flag inaccuracies and request corrections.

Community Contributions:

One of WikiHow’s strengths is its vibrant and engaged community of contributors. Users are encouraged to collaborate, share knowledge, and improve articles through editing and feedback. This community-driven approach fosters a sense of ownership and accountability among contributors, leading to continuous improvement and refinement of content. Additionally, WikiHow provides forums and discussion boards where users can seek advice, share tips, and discuss topics related to article content.

Perceived Reliability:

The perception of WikiHow’s reliability varies among users and depends on factors such as individual experiences, familiarity with the platform, and the specific topic being discussed. For some users, WikiHow may be seen as a valuable resource for practical advice and how-to guides, while others may view it with skepticism due to concerns about accuracy and credibility. Ultimately, the perceived reliability of WikiHow is subjective and influenced by a variety of factors.

Final Conclusion on is Wikihow reliable

In conclusion, WikiHow is a popular online resource that provides a wide range of how-to guides, tutorials, and informational articles. Its collaborative authorship model, editorial processes, and community-driven approach contribute to the reliability and credibility of its content. While WikiHow strives to maintain high standards of accuracy and quality, its reliance on community contributions means that occasional inaccuracies or errors may occur. Users should exercise critical thinking and cross-reference information from multiple sources when using WikiHow as a resource. Overall, WikiHow can be a valuable tool for learning and problem-solving, but users should approach its content with discernment and caution.


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *